MONROVIA: Nimba County Representative and political leader of the Citizens Movement for Change, Musa Hassan Bility, has issued a strong public warning over what he describes as emerging threats to Liberia’s democratic stability, citing the ongoing proceedings against fellow lawmaker Yekeh Kolubah as a potential turning point. In a detailed statement issued via his column, Letter from Saclepea, Bility acknowledged concerns about Kolubah’s conduct but cautioned against what he termed selective enforcement and politically motivated discipline. He further pointed to recent developments involving electoral governance, civic space, and free expression as indicators of a broader pattern requiring urgent national attention and institutional restraint. THE ANALYST reports.
Bility Warns Against “Selective Justice,” Cautions Government on Democratic Risks
Nimba County Representative and political leader of the Citizens Movement for Change (CMC), Musa Hassan Bility, has issued a strongly worded statement warning of what he describes as growing threats to Liberia’s democratic space, urging national stakeholders to act with caution as tensions rise within key state institutions.
Writing under this column Letter from Saclepea, titled “The Danger Lurking Ahead,” Bility expressed deep concern over the ongoing proceedings in the House of Representatives involving Montserrado County District #10 Representative, Yekeh Kolubah, cautioning that the matter could have broader implications for governance and institutional credibility.
The House has initiated a formal probe into Representative Kolubah over remarks widely criticized as disrespectful to the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice. While Bility acknowledged that such comments were inappropriate, he emphasized that the issue now extends beyond individual conduct.
“I am not a fan of Yekeh Kolubah’s style,” Bility stated. “I do not support his insults against the Supreme Court, and I believe his attacks on the Chief Justice were wrong and unnecessary.”
He stressed that respect for institutions, particularly the judiciary, remains fundamental to democratic governance, adding that freedom of speech must not be interpreted as a license for unfounded allegations or institutional disrespect.
However, Bility warned that the current proceedings risk being perceived as selective enforcement, raising concerns about fairness and consistency in the application of legislative discipline.
“This moment is no longer just about Yekeh Kolubah,” he noted. “It is about measuring wrongdoing in our country. It is about the selective tolerance of those in power.”
According to the CMC leader, the situation risks sending a broader signal to lawmakers and the public that dissenting voices may face disproportionate consequences, potentially discouraging open debate within the Legislature.
“It looks like an attempt to silence not just one lawmaker, but the rest of us,” Bility said, cautioning that such developments could gradually erode democratic norms.
Links Broader Concerns to National Governance Trends
Beyond the Kolubah matter, Bility pointed to what he described as a series of developments that, taken together, suggest a narrowing democratic space.
Among these, he referenced ongoing debates surrounding the leadership of the National Elections Commission, noting that public confidence in electoral institutions remains critical to sustaining democratic legitimacy.
While acknowledging differing views on the issue, Bility emphasized that the perception of neutrality within electoral bodies must be preserved at all times.
“Elections can only be credible when the institution managing them is seen as independent, impartial, and above party suspicion,” he stated.
The Nimba lawmaker also raised concerns about reported incidents affecting civic space, including actions targeting rights advocacy organizations. He warned that such developments could create an environment of fear among civil society actors and weaken accountability mechanisms.
In addition, Bility pointed to emerging legislative discussions around regulating online speech, cautioning that while addressing abuse is important, any measures must be carefully balanced to protect free expression.
“A democracy must protect people from abuse, yes, but it must also be careful not to turn laws into weapons against criticism,” he said.
Warns Against Institutional Imbalance
Bility further cautioned that these issues, when viewed collectively, may indicate a pattern of institutional pressure that could undermine Liberia’s democratic gains.
He warned that sustained perceptions of selective justice, combined with concerns over electoral credibility and civic space, could weaken public trust in governance.
“I fear that institutions meant to protect the Republic may instead be bent toward protecting political power,” he stated.
The CMC political leader emphasized that Liberia’s democratic progress over the past two decades has been hard-won and should not be taken for granted.
“For twenty years, we have tried to build a democratic culture rooted in elections, debate, and constitutional order,” he said. “We must not allow that progress to be reversed.”
Calls for National Vigilance and Engagement
Bility concluded by calling on a broad range of national stakeholders—including civil society organizations, religious institutions, traditional leaders, the media, and international partners—to remain engaged and vigilant.
“Silence in moments like this is not neutrality,” he cautioned. “Silence becomes permission.”
He urged those in positions of authority to act with restraint and to prioritize the long-term integrity of democratic institutions over short-term political considerations.
“Political power is temporary,” Bility said. “But the damage done to democratic institutions can last for generations.”
A Cautionary Note for Leadership
While reiterating his concerns, Bility expressed hope that national leadership would take the necessary steps to ensure fairness, protect institutional independence, and preserve democratic norms.
“I pray that wisdom prevails,” he stated. “I pray that we do not wake up one day to realize that what we dismissed as ordinary politics was, in fact, the slow dismantling of our democracy.”
The statement has already begun to generate discussion across political and civic spaces, as Liberia continues to navigate a complex period marked by institutional tensions and heightened public scrutiny.
Comments are closed.