AML Contractor Arrested in Ganta-Over Alleged Rape Incident; Company Reaffirms Zero Tolerance Policy

MONROVIA – ArcelorMittal Liberia (AML) has confirmed that a contractor associated with its operations has been arrested in connection with an alleged rape incident reported in Ganta, Nimba County, prompting renewed scrutiny of contractor conduct within Liberia’s extractive sector.

In a statement issued from Yekepa on April 7, AML acknowledged awareness of the arrest, describing the matter as a “serious criminal allegation” now under investigation by relevant authorities.

The company emphasized that it maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy toward any conduct that violates Liberian law, particularly offenses of a criminal nature.

“We maintain a zero tolerance stance toward any behavior that violates or breaches the laws of Liberia. Allegations of this nature are treated with the highest level of seriousness,” the company said.

Contractor Under Scrutiny

While AML clarified that the individual arrested is not a direct employee but a contractor linked to its operations, the company stressed that all contractors and their personnel are bound by the same ethical and legal expectations imposed on AML staff.

According to the statement, the company is currently engaging the contracting firm involved to ensure full compliance with its standards, contractual obligations, and Liberia’s legal framework.

“AML expects its contractors and their employees to uphold the same commitment to responsible conduct that the company demands from its own staff,” the statement added.

The identity of the contractor and specific details surrounding the alleged incident have not been disclosed, with AML citing the need to preserve the integrity of the ongoing legal process and protect the privacy of those involved.

Cooperation with Authorities

AML further assured that it is cooperating fully with Liberian authorities as investigations proceed. The company refrained from commenting on the specifics of the case, noting that premature disclosures could interfere with due process.

“To preserve the integrity of the ongoing legal process and to protect the privacy of everyone involved, we are unable to provide further details at this time,” the statement noted.