Guilty Verdict in Census Fraud Case-Former LISGIS officials convicted on all six charges

MONROVIA – The conviction of senior public officials entrusted with managing Liberia’s most critical national data exercise marks a significant moment in the country’s ongoing struggle against corruption and abuse of public office. Population and housing censuses form the backbone of national planning, budget allocation, and international development support, making their integrity essential to governance and public trust. The guilty verdict in the 2022 census corruption case sends a clear signal that financial misconduct in nationally strategic programs will not be treated as routine administrative failure but as a serious criminal breach. For anti-corruption advocates, the outcome underscores a growing willingness by the justice system to confront high-level wrongdoing and uphold accountability in the management of public resources. The Analyst reports.

The Liberia Anti-Corruption Commission (LACC) has announced that a twelve-member jury sitting before Criminal Court C has returned a unanimous guilty verdict against former senior officials of the Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services (LISGIS) in the long-running corruption case linked to the 2022 National Population and Housing Census.

According to the LACC, the jury found Dominic Paye, former Comptroller of LISGIS, and Lawrence George, former Deputy Director-General for Administration, guilty on all six criminal charges brought against them by the State.

The verdict was delivered following the close of final arguments and the completion of jury deliberations, bringing to a decisive close a trial that has drawn national attention for more than two years.

The case centered on allegations of financial misconduct, abuse of public trust, and the misappropriation of funds earmarked for the conduct of the 2022 National Population and Housing Census.

The census was described by prosecutors as a critical national undertaking, essential for evidence-based policymaking, equitable distribution of public services, and long-term development planning.

Throughout the trial, the prosecution presented both oral testimony and documentary evidence purporting to show that public funds allocated for census-related activities were unlawfully diverted.

According to the LACC, evidence laid before the court detailed procurement irregularities, unauthorized payments, and disbursements for services that were either inflated or never rendered.

State prosecutors argued that the actions of the defendants not only violated financial and procurement laws but also undermined the credibility of a national institution tasked with producing accurate demographic data.

They maintained that the alleged misconduct compromised public confidence in the census process and risked distorting development planning and resource allocation.

The defense, for its part, contested the allegations and challenged the credibility of the evidence presented.

However, after weighing the submissions from both sides, the jury returned a unanimous verdict of guilt on all counts, signaling that the prosecution had met the burden of proof required under the law.

In a statement released following the verdict, the LACC described the outcome as a significant affirmation of Liberia’s anti-corruption framework and the role of the judiciary in enforcing accountability.

The Commission said the case demonstrates that public officials, regardless of rank or position, will be held answerable for the misuse of state resources.

The conviction is widely viewed as one of the most consequential anti-corruption cases tied to a national development program in recent years.

Observers note that the census, often supported by international partners and used as a benchmark for donor assistance, occupies a uniquely sensitive place in Liberia’s governance architecture.

Any misuse of funds intended for such an exercise, analysts say, has far-reaching implications beyond immediate financial loss.

The LACC reiterated that the guilty verdict should serve as a deterrent to others entrusted with managing public resources.

The Commission emphasized that corruption in sectors central to national planning and service delivery undermines development outcomes and erodes public trust in state institutions.

While sentencing is expected to follow in accordance with the law, the LACC said it remains committed to pursuing corruption cases professionally and independently, guided by evidence and due process.

The Commission also urged public institutions to strengthen internal controls and compliance mechanisms to prevent similar abuses in the future.

The case, which dates back to investigations initiated after the 2022 census process, reflects the LACC’s broader mandate to investigate, prosecute, and prevent corruption across government institutions. Officials say the Commission will continue to collaborate with the judiciary and other integrity institutions to ensure that accountability remains a central pillar of governance in Liberia.