The Solicitor-General on behalf of Assets Investigation, Restitution and Recovery Team (AIRReT) writes ECOBANK Liberia Limited to restitute over US$4m into the Government of Liberia Account. This amount, according to AIRReT, representsΒ cash performance bond posted by ECOBANK Liberia on behalf of the Chinese Company CNQC for the renovation of the Execution Mansion which the company defaulted. See below AIRReTβs letter to ECOBANK Liberia.
Β August 12, 2019
The Managing Director
ECOBANK Liberia Limited
Monrovia, Liberia
Re: Directive for the Return of Performance Bond in the tone of US$4,378,245.49
Dear Mr. Managing Director:
We present our compliments and hereby officially direct that you unconditionally return and deposit into the coffers of the Government of Liberia the amount of US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eighty Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents) representing the performance bond (indemnity bond) that you executed on behalf of the Chinese company CNQC on managerβs check N0. 0158998 for the renovation of the Executive Mansion on 19 December 2012.
Further, you will recall that the original of the managerβs check together with the duplicate copyΒ Β representing the performance bond was given back to you forΒ Β renewal or reissuance or for you to make good its monetary value and have same deposited into governmentβs accountΒ Β on 20 March, 2017, by the then Minister of State without Portfolio, Hon. J. Fonati Koffa.Β It isΒ now clearΒ thatΒ you took repossession of the managerβs check(performance bond) and its duplicateΒ Β copyΒ after you intentionallyΒ Β rejectedΒ itsΒ photocopy, contending thatΒ the governmentΒ returnΒ the original copy, and in good faith,Β Β the managerβs check was subsequentlyΒ transmitted to youΒ in a letter dated 20 March, 2017, to be either renewed or reissued, but you deliberatelyΒ failed andΒ strangelyΒ Β chose to unilaterallyΒ dismissΒ its(performance bond)Β validityΒ Β on grounds that it was no longer valid or operational or itΒ Β had expired.
It must be noted that theΒ Government of Liberia did not have any form of contract with you whether directly or indirectly regarding the performance bond;Β and moreover, the managerβs check representing the performance bondΒ was, is, and remains the exclusive property of the Government of Liberia,Β and this is further demonstrated by the fact that the government held onto, and did exercise full and uninterruptedΒ actual possessionΒ overΒ the managerβs check up to, and including 20 March 2017, about three years after theΒ Β cancellation of the contract with CNQC on 31 December 2014.
Therefore, thisΒ communication constitutesΒ theΒ official directive for and on behalf of the Government of Liberia to you,Β for the return and deposit, without any precondition, of the original managerβs check value ofΒ US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents), without any further delay. The basis of this directive is due toΒ the fact that the contractualΒ Β intent and purposeΒ Β for which the performance bond was tendered by you,Β wasΒ after all, never achieved;Β CNQCΒ Β inarguably defaultedΒ in theΒ performance of the Executive MansionΒ renovationΒ contract, and same was subsequentlyΒ terminated by mutual consent.
However, a careful review of the records, shows that the contract had a lifespan of 18 calendar months, and was valued at US21, 891,227.49(US Dollars Twenty One Million Eight Hundred Ninety One Two Hundred Twenty seven Forty Nine Cents), and the Government of Liberia, unaware of whateverΒ Β intent you had in store to repossess the managerβs check by whatever means in later years, and unilaterally absolve yourself of any and all liabilities,Β Β Β relied on the purportedΒ financialΒ sufficiencyΒ of theΒ performance bond tendered,Β guaranteeingΒ CNQCβs performance of the contract, andΒ sequentially disbursed or caused to disburse during theΒ period ofΒ the alleged implementation, taxpayersβ money in the amounts of US$7, 661,929.62(US SixΒ Million Six Hundred Sixty OneΒ Β Dollars Nine Hundred Twenty Nine Sixty Two cents), US$8,756,491( US Dollars Eight Million Seven Hundred Fifty Six Four Hundred Ninety One Sixty Two cents) andΒ US5,472, 806.87(US Five Million Four Hundred seventy Two Eight Hundred Six Dollars Eighty Seven cents)Β respectively, totaling USD 21,891,227.49. (US Dollars Twenty One Million Eight Hundred Ninety One Two Hundred Twenty seven Forty Nine Cents) See Article IV (a, b & c) of the contractual agreement.
Further, we also note that Article IV (d) of the contract, provides that the renovation work should have commenced or did commence on 2 January 2013, and should have ended or effectively ended on 30 June 2014, but remained in force and effect up to, and including 31 December 2014 which isΒ Β the effective date of cancellation as contained in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of 2015. This means the performance bond guaranteeing CNQCβs execution of the renovation contract was incontestablyΒ Β valid and operationalΒ Β up to, and including 31 December 2014, about five (5) months after it should expired upon the completion of the renovation works and same had remained in the possession of the Government of Liberia up to and including 20 March 2017.
It is important to stress that ECOBANK was at liberty to inform CNQC that the performance bond tendered on its behalf which was in the possession of the government of Liberia up to 20 March 2017 had expired or had become invalid and thereby seek its repossession but woefully failed to do so because it knew or had reason to know thatΒ the cancellation ofΒ CNQCβsΒ Β contractΒ onΒ 31 December, 2014 did not in any way injure orΒ concludeΒ the right of theΒ government from exercisingΒ full control over or takingΒ possessionΒ ofΒ the performance bond.
Besides, theΒ purportedΒ execution of a Memorandum of Understanding(MoU), cancelling the renovation contract in 2015 as in keeping with Article V section 1 made no reference to either ECOBANK or theΒ performance bond; itΒ Β did notΒ retrieve or nullifyΒ the performance bondΒ in the possession of the Government of Liberia and did notΒ Β preclude the Government of Liberia from exercisingΒ control over, or fromΒ Β claimingΒ orΒ demandingΒ the deposit of the performance bond or its monetary value into its coffers.Β Article V section 1Β of the agreement states: βIf the contractor should be adjudged bankrupt, or if the contract should make a general assignment for the benefit of the Contractorβs creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of the contractorβs insolvency, or if theΒ contractor should persistently or repeatedly refuse or fail to observe laws or ordinances or the instructions of the general consultant or project manager, representing the OWNER, upon the issuance of a certificate by the general consultant or project manager, indicating that sufficient cause exists to justify such action, the OWNER may without prejudice to any other right or remedy, and after giving the Contractor seven days written notice, terminate the employment of the contractor take possession of the premises including all materials, equipment, tools, machinery and appliances thereof and finish the work by whatever means the OWNER may deem expedient.β
It must beΒ noted that theΒ expression:ββ¦the OWNER may without prejudice to any other right or remedyβ¦βΒ Β terminate employment of the contract after giving the contractor seven daysΒ written notice, clearly supports the intent and purpose of thisΒ Β Letter Demand for theΒ Β deposit of US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents)Β into the account of the government of Liberia for the fact that the managerβs check representing the performance bondΒ was acquiredΒ or repossessed by tricks and artificeΒ by ECOBANK Liberia LimitedΒ fromΒ Hon. Koffa. Also, the word βmayβ as used in Article V Section 1, which is meant to protect and not to prejudice βany other right or remedyβ of the Government of Liberia, is after allΒ discretionary; and it provides no time-bar or no statute of limitationsΒ as to whenΒ the government shouldΒ exercise such right or demand such remedy.
Furthermore, the waiver of claims against CNQC are indisputably exclusive of, or did not cover or extend to the performance bond which was, and had been in the possession of or had been the exclusive property of the government, and therefore,Β theΒ Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of 2015Β was executed βwithout prejudice to any other right or remedyβ as in the case of the performance bondβit should have been returned by ECOBANK onlyΒ upon the issuance of a certificate satisfying the completion of the renovation work but was never done because CNQC defaulted.
Β That said,Β Β and in good faith,Β Β the Government of LiberiaΒ Β herebyΒ directs and advises you, as before,Β Β to unreservedly, and in the spirit of good partnership,Β deposit the amount of US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eighty Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents)Β Β intoΒ government consolidated account at the Central Bank of Liberia(CBL), and after that, you are further directed toΒ Β proceed toΒ the Assets Investigation, Restitution and Recovery Team(AIRReT)Β offices located onΒ Center Street, downtown Monrovia, and present the bank slip showingΒ the payment or theΒ deposit of the amount in questionΒ withinΒ Β fourteen(14 )working daysΒ Β Β as of the date of this communicationΒ to avoid any embarrassment.
As Solicitor-General of this Republic, itΒ is also importantΒ to remind you thatΒ the diplomatic harmony highlighted in the fourth paragraph of the preamble of the Memorandum of Understanding(MoU) executed in 2015Β Β which somehow suggests aΒ Β Β reciprocity recognition of sovereign immunity as aΒ basis of notΒ Β pursuingΒ Β any and all furtherΒ Β claims arising from orΒ growing out of the cancelled contract,Β did not extend to ECOBANK Liberia limitedΒ as a private party, and sameΒ didΒ not annul or cancel the legitimacy ofΒ the performance bond which was already in the possession of governmentΒ orΒ did not prejudice the right of government in exercising control over or enjoying theΒ cash benefits thereof.Β Β See Article V section 1 of the contract.
Finally, while the government of LiberiaΒ through the office of the Solicitor-General has mandated AIRReTΒ to investigateΒ Β Β the allegedΒ Β termination of CNQCβs contractΒ Β Β on December 31, 2014,Β and theΒ purported waiving ofΒ taxpayersβ money in the amount ofΒ US21,891,227.49(US Dollars Twenty One Million Eight Hundred Ninety One Two Hundred Twenty seven Forty Nine Cents),Β which was secured from legislative budgetary allocation for the renovation of the Executive Mansion,Β as well asΒ Β allΒ claims arising from poor performance, underperformance, lack of ingenuity in engineering designs and specifications,Β and the provisions of cheap materials for the renovation works,Β Β on the basis ofΒ good diplomatic relations between the contractorβs(CNQCβs) country andΒ government,Β it must be emphatically clarified thatΒ such waiver,Β however,Β did not extend toΒ Β Β the performance bond orΒ Β Β ECOBANK which wasΒ not a party to any of the agreements; and the waiver of claims Β did not prejudice the Β ββ¦any other right or remedyβ provision of Article v section 1 Β of OWNERβsΒ possession of the performance bond.
We are therefore confident,Β as always, andΒ as ourΒ viable economic partner,Β that you will humbly comply with this directive in good faith unconditionally, and ensure that our endeavour to recover the US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eighty Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents) for andΒ on behalf of theΒ struggling taxpayers of Liberia, and have same deposited into governmentβs accountΒ Β Β is duly and forthrightlyΒ Β respected,Β andΒ same shall not easily be distracted by multiple administrative excuses.
Thanks.
Faithfully,
Cllr. Sayma Julius Syrenius Cephus
SOLICITOR-GENERAL/ Certified Counsel, ICC, STL, ADC-ICT, ECBA,EFCL, AEA, JLΒ & IAP
CC:Β Minster of Justice/ Attorney-General
βMinister of State /Presidential Affairs
βMinister of Finance & Development Planning (MFDP)
βCllr. Arthur T. Johnson, Chairman, AIRReT