AIRReT Gives ECOBANK 14-day ultimatum -To Return Performance Bond in the tone of US$4,378,245.49

The Solicitor-General on behalf of Assets Investigation, Restitution and Recovery Team (AIRReT) writes ECOBANK Liberia Limited to restitute over US$4m into the Government of Liberia Account. This amount, according to AIRReT, representsΒ cash performance bond posted by ECOBANK Liberia on behalf of the Chinese Company CNQC for the renovation of the Execution Mansion which the company defaulted. See below AIRReT’s letter to ECOBANK Liberia.

Β August 12, 2019

The Managing Director

ECOBANK Liberia Limited

Monrovia, Liberia

Re: Directive for the Return of Performance Bond in the tone of US$4,378,245.49

Dear Mr. Managing Director:

We present our compliments and hereby officially direct that you unconditionally return and deposit into the coffers of the Government of Liberia the amount of US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eighty Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents) representing the performance bond (indemnity bond) that you executed on behalf of the Chinese company CNQC on manager’s check N0. 0158998 for the renovation of the Executive Mansion on 19 December 2012.

Further, you will recall that the original of the manager’s check together with the duplicate copyΒ Β  representing the performance bond was given back to you forΒ Β  renewal or reissuance or for you to make good its monetary value and have same deposited into government’s accountΒ Β  on 20 March, 2017, by the then Minister of State without Portfolio, Hon. J. Fonati Koffa.Β  It isΒ  now clearΒ  thatΒ  you took repossession of the manager’s check(performance bond) and its duplicateΒ  Β copyΒ  after you intentionallyΒ Β  rejectedΒ  itsΒ  photocopy, contending thatΒ  the governmentΒ  returnΒ  the original copy, and in good faith,Β Β  the manager’s check was subsequentlyΒ  transmitted to youΒ  in a letter dated 20 March, 2017, to be either renewed or reissued, but you deliberatelyΒ  failed andΒ  strangelyΒ Β  chose to unilaterallyΒ  dismissΒ  its(performance bond)Β  validityΒ Β  on grounds that it was no longer valid or operational or itΒ Β  had expired.

It must be noted that theΒ  Government of Liberia did not have any form of contract with you whether directly or indirectly regarding the performance bond;Β  and moreover, the manager’s check representing the performance bondΒ  was, is, and remains the exclusive property of the Government of Liberia,Β  and this is further demonstrated by the fact that the government held onto, and did exercise full and uninterruptedΒ  actual possessionΒ  overΒ  the manager’s check up to, and including 20 March 2017, about three years after theΒ Β  cancellation of the contract with CNQC on 31 December 2014.

Therefore, thisΒ  communication constitutesΒ  theΒ  official directive for and on behalf of the Government of Liberia to you,Β  for the return and deposit, without any precondition, of the original manager’s check value ofΒ  US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents), without any further delay. The basis of this directive is due toΒ  the fact that the contractualΒ Β  intent and purposeΒ Β  for which the performance bond was tendered by you,Β  wasΒ  after all, never achieved;Β  CNQCΒ Β  inarguably defaultedΒ  in theΒ  performance of the Executive MansionΒ  renovationΒ  contract, and same was subsequentlyΒ  terminated by mutual consent.

However, a careful review of the records, shows that the contract had a lifespan of 18 calendar months, and was valued at US21, 891,227.49(US Dollars Twenty One Million Eight Hundred Ninety One Two Hundred Twenty seven Forty Nine Cents), and the Government of Liberia, unaware of whateverΒ Β  intent you had in store to repossess the manager’s check by whatever means in later years, and unilaterally absolve yourself of any and all liabilities,Β Β Β  relied on the purportedΒ  financialΒ  sufficiencyΒ  of theΒ  performance bond tendered,Β  guaranteeingΒ  CNQC’s performance of the contract, andΒ  sequentially disbursed or caused to disburse during theΒ  period ofΒ  the alleged implementation, taxpayers’ money in the amounts of US$7, 661,929.62(US SixΒ  Million Six Hundred Sixty OneΒ Β  Dollars Nine Hundred Twenty Nine Sixty Two cents), US$8,756,491( US Dollars Eight Million Seven Hundred Fifty Six Four Hundred Ninety One Sixty Two cents) andΒ  US5,472, 806.87(US Five Million Four Hundred seventy Two Eight Hundred Six Dollars Eighty Seven cents)Β  respectively, totaling USD 21,891,227.49. (US Dollars Twenty One Million Eight Hundred Ninety One Two Hundred Twenty seven Forty Nine Cents) See Article IV (a, b & c) of the contractual agreement.

Further, we also note that Article IV (d) of the contract, provides that the renovation work should have commenced or did commence on 2 January 2013, and should have ended or effectively ended on 30 June 2014, but remained in force and effect up to, and including 31 December 2014 which isΒ Β  the effective date of cancellation as contained in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of 2015. This means the performance bond guaranteeing CNQC’s execution of the renovation contract was incontestablyΒ Β  valid and operationalΒ Β  up to, and including 31 December 2014, about five (5) months after it should expired upon the completion of the renovation works and same had remained in the possession of the Government of Liberia up to and including 20 March 2017.

It is important to stress that ECOBANK was at liberty to inform CNQC that the performance bond tendered on its behalf which was in the possession of the government of Liberia up to 20 March 2017 had expired or had become invalid and thereby seek its repossession but woefully failed to do so because it knew or had reason to know thatΒ  the cancellation ofΒ  CNQC’sΒ Β  contractΒ  onΒ  31 December, 2014 did not in any way injure orΒ  concludeΒ  the right of theΒ  government from exercisingΒ  full control over or takingΒ  possessionΒ  ofΒ  the performance bond.

Besides, theΒ  purportedΒ  execution of a Memorandum of Understanding(MoU), cancelling the renovation contract in 2015 as in keeping with Article V section 1 made no reference to either ECOBANK or theΒ  performance bond; itΒ Β  did notΒ  retrieve or nullifyΒ  the performance bondΒ  in the possession of the Government of Liberia and did notΒ Β  preclude the Government of Liberia from exercisingΒ  control over, or fromΒ Β  claimingΒ  orΒ  demandingΒ  the deposit of the performance bond or its monetary value into its coffers.Β  Article V section 1Β  of the agreement states: β€œIf the contractor should be adjudged bankrupt, or if the contract should make a general assignment for the benefit of the Contractor’s creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of the contractor’s insolvency, or if theΒ  contractor should persistently or repeatedly refuse or fail to observe laws or ordinances or the instructions of the general consultant or project manager, representing the OWNER, upon the issuance of a certificate by the general consultant or project manager, indicating that sufficient cause exists to justify such action, the OWNER may without prejudice to any other right or remedy, and after giving the Contractor seven days written notice, terminate the employment of the contractor take possession of the premises including all materials, equipment, tools, machinery and appliances thereof and finish the work by whatever means the OWNER may deem expedient.”

It must beΒ  noted that theΒ  expression:β€œβ€¦the OWNER may without prejudice to any other right or remedy…”   terminate employment of the contract after giving the contractor seven daysΒ  written notice, clearly supports the intent and purpose of thisΒ Β  Letter Demand for theΒ Β  deposit of US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents)Β  into the account of the government of Liberia for the fact that the manager’s check representing the performance bondΒ  was acquiredΒ  or repossessed by tricks and artificeΒ  by ECOBANK Liberia LimitedΒ  fromΒ  Hon. Koffa. Also, the word β€œmay” as used in Article V Section 1, which is meant to protect and not to prejudice β€œany other right or remedy” of the Government of Liberia, is after allΒ  discretionary; and it provides no time-bar or no statute of limitationsΒ  as to whenΒ  the government shouldΒ  exercise such right or demand such remedy.

Furthermore, the waiver of claims against CNQC are indisputably exclusive of, or did not cover or extend to the performance bond which was, and had been in the possession of or had been the exclusive property of the government, and therefore,Β  theΒ  Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of 2015Β  was executed β€œwithout prejudice to any other right or remedy” as in the case of the performance bondβ€”it should have been returned by ECOBANK onlyΒ  upon the issuance of a certificate satisfying the completion of the renovation work but was never done because CNQC defaulted.

Β That said,Β Β  and in good faith,Β Β  the Government of LiberiaΒ Β  herebyΒ  directs and advises you, as before,Β Β  to unreservedly, and in the spirit of good partnership,Β  deposit the amount of US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eighty Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents)Β Β  intoΒ  government consolidated account at the Central Bank of Liberia(CBL), and after that, you are further directed toΒ Β  proceed toΒ  the Assets Investigation, Restitution and Recovery Team(AIRReT)Β  offices located onΒ  Center Street, downtown Monrovia, and present the bank slip showingΒ  the payment or theΒ  deposit of the amount in questionΒ  withinΒ Β  fourteen(14 )working daysΒ Β Β  as of the date of this communicationΒ  to avoid any embarrassment.

As Solicitor-General of this Republic, itΒ  is also importantΒ  to remind you thatΒ  the diplomatic harmony highlighted in the fourth paragraph of the preamble of the Memorandum of Understanding(MoU) executed in 2015Β Β  which somehow suggests aΒ Β Β  reciprocity recognition of sovereign immunity as aΒ  basis of notΒ Β  pursuingΒ Β  any and all furtherΒ Β  claims arising from orΒ  growing out of the cancelled contract,Β  did not extend to ECOBANK Liberia limitedΒ  as a private party, and sameΒ  didΒ  not annul or cancel the legitimacy ofΒ  the performance bond which was already in the possession of governmentΒ  orΒ  did not prejudice the right of government in exercising control over or enjoying theΒ  cash benefits thereof.Β Β  See Article V section 1 of the contract.

Finally, while the government of LiberiaΒ  through the office of the Solicitor-General has mandated AIRReTΒ  to investigateΒ Β Β  the allegedΒ Β  termination of CNQC’s contractΒ Β Β  on December 31, 2014,Β  and theΒ  purported waiving ofΒ  taxpayers’ money in the amount ofΒ  US21,891,227.49(US Dollars Twenty One Million Eight Hundred Ninety One Two Hundred Twenty seven Forty Nine Cents),Β  which was secured from legislative budgetary allocation for the renovation of the Executive Mansion,Β  as well asΒ Β  allΒ  claims arising from poor performance, underperformance, lack of ingenuity in engineering designs and specifications,Β  and the provisions of cheap materials for the renovation works,Β Β  on the basis ofΒ  good diplomatic relations between the contractor’s(CNQC’s) country andΒ  government,Β  it must be emphatically clarified thatΒ  such waiver,Β  however,Β  did not extend toΒ Β Β  the performance bond orΒ Β Β  ECOBANK which wasΒ  not a party to any of the agreements; and the waiver of claims Β did not prejudice the Β β€œβ€¦any other right or remedy” provision of Article v section 1 Β of OWNER’sΒ  possession of the performance bond.

We are therefore confident,Β  as always, andΒ  as ourΒ  viable economic partner,Β  that you will humbly comply with this directive in good faith unconditionally, and ensure that our endeavour to recover the US$4,378,245.49(Four Million Three Hundred Seventy Eighty Thousand Two Hundred Forty Dollars Forty Nine Cents) for andΒ  on behalf of theΒ  struggling taxpayers of Liberia, and have same deposited into government’s accountΒ Β Β  is duly and forthrightlyΒ Β  respected,Β  andΒ  same shall not easily be distracted by multiple administrative excuses.

Thanks.

Faithfully,

Cllr. Sayma Julius Syrenius Cephus

SOLICITOR-GENERAL/ Certified Counsel, ICC, STL, ADC-ICT, ECBA,EFCL, AEA, JLΒ  & IAP

CC:Β  Minster of Justice/ Attorney-General

β€œMinister of State /Presidential Affairs

β€œMinister of Finance & Development Planning (MFDP)

β€œCllr. Arthur T. Johnson, Chairman, AIRReT

 

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More